Omohundro Institute of Early American History & Culture

Uncommon Sense—the blog

Refugees of the American Revolution … and George Orwell

· February 20th, 2020 · 1 Comment

By Matthew Dziennik


New York’s Refugees and Political Authority in Revolutionary America,” WMQ (Jan. 2020) began with an intellectual humbling.  It came at a brown bag at the Colonial Williamsburg Foundation where I was presenting on my research.  I laid out my argument in the clearest terms – the revolutionary committees of safety were fundamental to American independence but they were also oppressive organizations that limited the creation of free and open society.  They had exercised unlawful power, restricted free movement, and had clamped down on public gatherings that posed imagined risks to public order.  In the Q & A, I received a number of helpful questions and suggestions.  One participant – who will remain nameless – told me “You paint a very Orwellian picture of the Revolution.” Proud of myself, I agreed and thanked the participant for the compliment.  The reply was as incisive as it was chastening: “That was not meant as a compliment.” Of the many exchanges I’ve had over the years, this one remains with me.  And it remains with me because it was one of the most valuable I have ever had. 

My initial reaction was to double down on the interpretation.  If the interpretation was unsettling, I must be doing something right.  It is a good thing to be guilty of thoughtcrime.  It took several days to realized that they might have had a point.  I had been so committed to a particular vision of the Revolution that I had let my argument run ahead of the evidence.  I had engaged in historical anachronism of the highest order.  

The exchange did not change my fundamental understanding of the committees of safety but it was an essential course corrective.  I needed to tell the story of the committees of safety in a way that embraced both the coercive aspects of political authority as well as the genuine commitment to republican theory embraced by the members of these committees.  I needed to engage in some historical doublethink.  

Trawling through the records of various committees of safety, I had uncovered substantive references to “refugees.”  While almost entirely ignored in histories of the Revolution – displacement being seen as synonymous with Loyalism – it was striking that refugees sympathetic to the Revolution had been at the heart of debates over public welfare, taxation, property, and where political authority should ultimately reside.  These debates were particularly contentious in New York.  Refugees became a means of navigating the muddled story of how supporting the displaced came to help underpin revolutionary political authority in New York.  

But the article that was finally published could not have been more different from my initial drafts.  I experimented with various organizing themes – sovereignty, legitimacy, political authority – but could not strike the right balance between the genuine desire of revolutionaries to protect their citizens and the often callous disregard to which the dispossessed were sometimes subjected.  I had initially posited that supporting refugees had been done to build revolutionary legitimacy but I quickly ran into a problem of source deficiency. The lack of refugee voices was an enduring problem and one that was never quite resolved even in the final article.  I searched long and hard to find refugee perspectives but struggled to identify a solid base of evidence … perhaps there really is a memory hole!   

Fortunately, there is an advantage in having numerous and excellent Readers Reports.  It was the Readers who recognized the problem of legitimacy and suggested the possibilities of political authority.  It was the Readers who recognized that, while there was something interesting to New York’s refugees, the article did not make a significant intervention in the historiography of the Revolution.  And it was the Readers who challenged me to better understand the changing context of refugee relief throughout the war.  Getting these reports – which I think came to about 18 pages in total including Josh Piker’s commentary – was a scary moment (my very own Room 101) but they were absolutely necessary.  When combined with the comments of numerous friends and fellow historians they enabled me to situate the argument more effectively.  Words cannot express the extent of the gratitude I owe to the Readers and my colleagues. 

The resulting essay suggests that the political structures of the Revolution combined both altruism and coercive power in ways that resist easy categorization.  It certainly gets to the heart of the complexities of the American Revolution far better than my anachronistic jaunt into revolutionary dystopia.  The essay began with an intellectual humbling.  Sometimes, 2 + 2 = 5. 

One Response

  1. ken kockridgeBelow says:

    Ziennick’s essay is great, and a tip ofcthe hat to thecreaders, .Josh Piker definitely included. Good readers may have made it easier to stay loose. A good article can present difficult choices. well done, all. In my day we were not yet quite so loose and thoughtful at Reader’s Report time.

    But it is possible to need to resist arrogant editors who cite all the prized “their” articles and books have won. I do know several authord whose second books did not govto the Institute yet were splendid. There was, alas, a reason for this. And they were not masochists. So they left our beloved Institute. Those days are now gone. May they not return.

    Well dne, all.
    Ken
    .

Leave a Reply

agen judi bola , sportbook, casino, togel, number game, singapore, tangkas, basket, slot, poker, dominoqq, agen bola. Semua permainan bisa dimainkan hanya dengan 1 ID. minimal deposit 50.000 ,- bonus cashback hingga 10% , diskon togel hingga 66% bisa bermain di android dan IOS kapanpun dan dimana pun. poker , bandarq , aduq, domino qq , bandarqq online terpercaya. Semua permainan bisa dimainkan hanya dengan 1 ID. minimal deposit 10.000 ,- bonus turnover 0.5% dan bonus referral 20%. Bonus - bonus yang dihadirkan bisa terbilang cukup tinggi dan memuaskan, anda hanya perlu memasang pada situs yang memberikan bursa pasaran terbaik yaitu Bola168. Situs penyedia segala jenis permainan poker online kini semakin banyak ditemukan di Internet, salah satunya TahunQQ merupakan situs Agen Judi Domino66 Dan BandarQ Terpercaya yang mampu memberikan banyak provit bagi bettornya. Permainan Yang Di Sediakan Dewi365 Juga sangat banyak Dan menarik dan Peluang untuk memenangkan Taruhan Judi online ini juga sangat mudah . Mainkan Segera Taruhan Sportbook anda bersama Agen Judi Bola Bersama Dewi365 Kemenangan Anda Berapa pun akan Terbayarkan. Tersedia 9 macam permainan seru yang bisa kamu mainkan hanya di dalam 1 ID saja. Permainan seru yang tersedia seperti Poker, Domino QQ Dan juga BandarQ Online. DEWI365 adalah Bandar Judi Bola Terpercaya & resmi dan terpercaya di indonesia. Situs judi bola ini menyediakan fasilitas bagi anda untuk dapat bermain memainkan permainan judi bola. Didalam situs ini memiliki berbagai permainan taruhan bola terlengkap seperti Sbobet, yang membuat DEWI365 menjadi situs judi bola terbaik dan terpercaya di Indonesia. Tentunya sebagai situs yang bertugas sebagai Bandar Poker Online pastinya akan berusaha untuk menjaga semua informasi dan keamanan yang terdapat di POKERQQ13. DEWI365 adalah Bandar Judi Bola Terpercaya & resmi dan terpercaya di indonesia. Situs judi bola ini menyediakan fasilitas bagi anda untuk dapat bermain memainkan permainan judi bola. Kotakqq adalah situs Judi Poker Online Terpercayayang menyediakan 9 jenis permainan sakong online, dominoqq, domino99, bandarq, bandar ceme, aduq, poker online, bandar poker, balak66, perang baccarat, dan capsa susun. Dengan minimal deposit withdraw 15.000 Anda sudah bisa memainkan semua permaina pkv games di situs kami. Jackpot besar,Win rate tinggi, Fair play, PKV Games. BandarQ Online Situs BandarQQ, BandarQ Terpercaya, Mainkan QQ Uang Asli Dengan Server Pkv Games & Mainkan SitusQQ Online Melalui Deposit Pulsa.